52315 Views 6 Replies Latest reply: Aug 21, 2011 5:35 PM by Glenda Breaux RSS
Courtney Haynes 39 posts since
Jan 5, 2009
Currently Being Moderated

Oct 26, 2009 12:56 PM

Q & A from Policy 2.0 Event: How much and how should student achievement matter in teacher evaluations?

Our first recommendation was thought to be the most controversial.  Please share your thoughts on this and help us continue the conversation from our "Policy 2.0: Using Open Innovation To Reform Teacher Evaluation Systems" Q & A.

  • 3 posts since
    Sep 17, 2009

    I think that student achievement could probably account for about 50% of teacher evaluations. However, student achievement needs to be defined more broadly than standardized test scores, and evaluations should be weighted based on assessments of the level of parental involvement in their students' education. So, for instance, a teacher in a district with generally less parental support would not be held to the same standards as a teacher in a district with more involved parents.

    • Catherine Cullen 140 posts since
      May 29, 2009

      Brian makes a great point about balancing measures of student achievement, but I fundamentally disagree with his views on parental involvement. Teachers are accountable for what happens inside the classroom. While parents play a huge role in student success, we can't give up on kids with disengaged parents or hold them (and their teachers) to lower standards. The point of using education to expand the Opportunity Economy is to overcome those challenges, not use them as an excuse to lower expectations for some kids and their teachers.

  • 20 posts since
    Sep 22, 2010

    I could not fairly state an amount that student achievement should count towards a teacher’s evaluation.  I do, however, believe that student input into their own educational process should be factored in.  I have far too many students who choose to take no active part in their own education.  I could be standing in front of the room with my pants on fire and they would not reach into their pocket to take out a pencil.  Student accountability needs to be discussed as much as teacher accountability.

     

    If a student chooses to not do homework, in-class work, take tests, attend class on a regular basis, and disrupt more than participate effectively why should I be accountable for his/her score.  Don’t blame it on classroom management.  I have made every effort to reach the students, called parents, give weekly progress reports, offer tutoring, grade contracts, etc.  Followed procedures to get guidance and others involved, but no progress is being made.  Yet, it is my fault the student does not succeed in my class??? PLEASE!

  • Dianne Abrams 13 posts since
    Jul 13, 2010

    I think that student progress should be the measuring stick for all teachers, but.........how to determine it and how to measure it is the tricky part.  I am most in favor of standardized pre and post testing for secondary classes and a series of varied measurements for elementary classes, weighted according to school, school district, and state priorities  X % to Math, X % to Reading, X % to writing, X % to Social Studies, X % to Science, x % to specials.  Average students should make one year's growth in each.  Students with disabilities and English Language Learners should have a different growth quotient based on the severity of their disability or their level of language.  Expectations for gifted students should be higher than one year's growth, based on a determination of their ability levels.

  • Glenda Breaux 9 posts since
    Jul 8, 2011

    I think the minimum amount that student performance should contribute to teacher evaluation should be about 25% and the maximum should be 50%.  Student performance should be measured in a pre-post manner for the given school year or course.  I think teachers should be expected to produce at least as much growth as previous teachers have with the same student.  This can get complicated as courses get more advanced or in courses that are not part of a series, but I think it could be worked out, especially with the use of pre-post measures.  I really like Dianne Abrams's weighting scheme and her differentiation scheme for students with differing levels of ability/prior performance.

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)