Oct 26, 2009 1:19 PM
Q & A from Policy 2.0 Event: Should there be wider input in teacher evaluations?
-
Like (0)
How can we incorporate feedback from students and parents in the teacher evaluation process?
Colleges have had student evaluations of teachers for years. As long as the questions are formated in a manner they are not subject to misinterpretation or bias why not. The problem is the formatting. Let us be honest, with a good majority of students having difficutly reading on level, if the questions are beyond them they will Christmas tree it like so many do the standardized tests.
With respect to parents we need to make sure that proper training has occured so they understand what it is all about, and again that the formatting is proper. The reason for that would be the same as above in many instances.
If parent and student should be included it needs to be weighted in an manner that does not out weigh other factors.
This is difficult in my field. I teach English Language Learners. Students and parents will both have difficulty filling out a survey due to language issues. We can have the survey translated but many of my parents don't have much formal education and may not read well in their native language, don't always return things sent home from school, don't feel they have time, etc. I dont' think I would get enough responses to get a true picture.
I am in the same field and do agree that it would be difficult, although it would be rewarding if there were some way to truly get good feedback from students and their parents.
Project Voyce is an organization in Denver that builds capacity in youth to become a larger voice within their schools. They've been working with our school to construct a student evaluation document, and we've leaned on the Boston Student Advisory Council a bit as a model. They've got what I think is a good tool, and based on the link below, they seem to be working strongly on how to incorporate student evaluations as part of the data being considered when determining teacher effectiveness.
http://http://schoolvictories.org/content/boston-student-advisory-council-youth-board
By the way, the school that I teach at, Bruce Randolph, also has a significant population of students acquiring English as their second language. We are only in our second year of implementing a school wide student evaluation of teachers, and as we roll out our second implementation, I'll definitely carry this lens with me. Hopefully soon, I can share something about this dilemma based on our school's experience.
Student input can be really valuable, but certain precautions need to be taken to protect the teacher from unfair negative judgments. For example, I have seen great teachers get bad reviews from students who were frequently absent, were zoned out when physically present, didn't complete assignments, or turned in poor quality assignments and expected to get good grades for simply bothering to do them. Then they stated things like, "I didn't learn anything in this class" or "The teacher didn't explain the material."
Teachers with the highest and lowest standards tend to get the most negative criticism. Before answering questions about the teacher, students should be "primed" by being required to first answer questions about their own behavior (e.g., their attendance, assignment completion, level of effort in and outside the classroom, etc.). Teachers also need some protection from the negative effect of institutional issues that they don't have control over (e.g., access to technology/equipment, physical aspects of the environment, scheduling, etc.). Some students rate a course or teacher poorly because they found it too hot or too cold in the room or because the class was too early or late in the day for their liking. Questions about these things should also be addressed prior to rating the teacher so the student can get it "off the chest" and to help them separate out the elements that are affecting their perceptions.
There should also be a comment section where students can say something in their own words. Here is where you often find out if ratings are based on things outside of the teacher's control, or whether there are specific actionable things the teacher can do to improve students' experience. It also gives a space where an evaluator can learn that a teacher had an especially positive influence on a student's learning or attitude towards learning a la, "Math never made sense to me until, Teacher X did..."
Parent input can follow similar principles, but should be an entirely different document from the student feedback form. But the parent form should encourage them to review the student feedback prior to responding.
Glenda, I couldn't agree more. In my mind, the tool should be more of a student perception tool than an evaluative one. Rather than asking questions which require students to make judgements about their teacher, questions should be descriptive in nature.
For example, "When I don't understand something in class...." (check all that apply)
__ my teacher expects me to ask my neighbor
__ I sign up for a conference with my teacher
__ my teacher often notices before I raise my hand
__ other: __________________________________
The link that I posted earlier in this discussion thread from Boston's Student Advisory Council is a great resource. Their tool has what you're proposing in that "students should be "primed" by being required to first answer questions about their own behavior (e.g., their attendance, assignment completion, level of effort in and outside the classroom, etc.)" While not all of the questions on their tool are descriptive in nature, there are several questions that make great models for the type of student survey that I'm thinking of.
By keeping the student perception tool descriptive in nature, rather than evaluative, we can still hear from the valuable student perspective but we aren't expecting the students to be experts in the craft of teaching.
I agree that the descriptive angle would be a more informative approach, as would a constrained list of option from which several could be selected. This could increase the cost and effort backend analysis as it wouldn't be as simple as asking for ratings in scantron format and generating averages (unless the "powers" invest in some 21st Century analytic tools), but I think the return in "useful information" would be worth the investment.
I'm going to review the Boston Council's resources. Maybe they have something that my current employer would find compelling enough to adapt and implement (Unfortunately, as in a lot of educational arenas, materials generated outside of the rank-and-file tend be less suspect and carry more weight than internally produced recommendations for change.)
| Privacy/Terms of Use | | | Community Guidelines | | | Support | | | ![]() | Download Acrobat Reader |
